Module C84ERP - assessment

Assessment for this module is based on three components (each contributing 33% of the C84RPS mark):

(1) a Graduate School Training portfolio with a reflection on learning outcomes, please see this example:

Course

Credit

Outcome

Introduction to library skills [GSTL28]

1

Learnt how to use web of science. The alerting function is particularly useful.
At the end of the document, please add a general reflection on the value of the training to you personally and suggestions for any further training you feel would be helpful. Total length of portfolio for example 2 pages A4 (or word count 1000 words). Please list all courses that you have taken, for obligatory courses please see here. In case you cannot attend an obligatory course, please see if the course is offered on another date, and book a place on that other date. If that is not possible please choose a similar course from the Graduate School programme and explain your choice in the portfolio. Please note that Graduate School credit points do not correspond 1:1 to MSc credit points. Assessment criteria: (1) list of courses has to be complete (please attach graduate school certificate); (2) portfolio needs to show that you have reflected on the relevance of graduate school courses to your training

(2) a lay summary of C84LCN research proposal, C84RPL placement plan, or C84PRO project plan; this could be half a page A4 (or word count 200 words). Assessment criteria: text has to be concise and understandable by an (educated) lay person without specific knowledge about cognitive neuroscience, psychology, ...

(3) ethics coursework - a summary of C84LCN research proposal, C84RPL placement plan, or C84PRO project plan as if for submission to ethics evaluation; please follow the guidelines for submission to the Psychology Ethics committee, 1 or 2 pages (or word count 1000 words) with description/rationale/procedure ... plus checklist, subject information sheet, consent form following templates (form 2 is not needed)

Assessment criteria: the submitted documents need to be complete and the experiment needs to be explained in such a way that it is understandable to an ethics committee. The subject information sheet needs to written in such a way that a subject can take an informed decision whether or not to take part in an experiment.

PLEASE NOTE that (3) is "as if" for submission to an ethics committee, and the Psychology ethics committee rules have been chosen as an example. Ethics coursework for C84RPS assessment and an actual submission to the ethics committee (if needed for C84RPL/PRO) are two different things. A satisfactory mark for the ethics coursework does NOT predict an affirmative response to an application submitted by you or your supervisor - independent of C84RPS - to the Psychology or Medical School ethics committee. Accordingly, assessment criteria for ethics coursework focus on presentation and completeness, and individual feedback on ethics coursework cannot be given.

Before electronic submission, please compile all documents related to (3) into a single file (best pdf).